Prior to GST, CBEC has issued various instructions regarding high sea sales appropriating the contract price paid by the last high sea sales buyer into the Customs valuation [Circular No. 32/2004-Cus. dated 11-5-2004 refers]. Such sale was considered as sale in the course of import into territory of India and was not subjected to sales tax. However, it is to be noted that if goods are cleared for warehousing and goods are sold from such warehouse, then such sale was not considered as High Sea Sales and were subjected to sales tax. However, buyer was required to file bill of entry from home consumption at the price at which bill of entry for warehousing was filed. Read on to know more…
GST Applicability on High Sea Sales
Article 286 of Constitution of India governs this taxation. In GST regime, no law of a State has the authority to frame law w.r.t. supply of goods or services or both in the course of import of goods or services or both into the territory of India. Only Parliament has the authority to formulate principles for determining when supply of goods or services or both take place in the course of import into territory of India. Therefore, such expression could be explained in IGST Act and not in other GST laws. ‘Customs Frontiers of India’ include customs warehouse also as per IGST Act, 2017 – An extension in area from CST Act, 1956. As per clause (4) of Section 2 of IGST Act, 2017 “customs frontiers of India” means the limits of a customs area as defined in Section 2 of the Customs Act, 1962 (52 of 1962.) As per clause (11) of Customs Act, 1962 “customs area” means the area of a customs station or a warehouse and includes any area in which imported goods or export goods are ordinarily kept before clearance by Customs Authorities A probable reason to extend the coverage of ‘customs frontier of India’ in GST could be that, under CST Act, bond-to-bond transfer of goods was exigible to sales tax, because Section 5(2) ibid was applicable only on sale or purchase taken place before the goods crosses from customs station. Since sale or purchase covered under Section 5(2) ibid was high sea sales only which were not exigible to sales tax, in order to levy GST on bond-to-bond transfer of goods, the limits of customs frontier of India have been extended up to customs warehouse. The expression ‘sale in the course of imports into territory of India’ as defined in CST Act is in conflict. Said expression as defined under CST Act extends the supplies made up to customs station within the meaning of term sale in the course of imports into territory of India. Further, said meaning is to be referred only for goods which are taxable under CST Act. As far as meaning of said term is concerned as far as supply is concerned, it is not defined under IGST Act. Import is complete once goods clears customs frontiers of India. As per clause (10) of Section 2 of IGST Act, 2017 “Import of goods” with its grammatical variations and cognate expressions means bringing goods into India from a place outside India. Therefore, the analysis made in para “Customs duties are not payable on High Sea Sale transaction” in respect of meaning of import of goods, applies mutatis mutandis in GST regime also. Case when goods are sold in ‘High Seas’ i.e. when these do not reach ‘Exclusive Economic Zone’ IGST Act imposes levy only on ‘Import of Goods’ as per Customs Tariff Act, 1975, not on ‘supply of goods in the course of import into territory of India’. Integrated tax on goods imported into India shall be levied and collected in accordance with the provisions of Section 3 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 on the value as determined under the said Act at the point when duties of customs are levied on the said goods under Section 12 of the Customs Act, 1962. [Proviso to sub-Section (1) of Section 5 of IGST Act, 2017] IGST Act nowhere defines taxation on supply of goods in the course of import into territory of India though Parliament has been authorised by virtue of article 286(2) of Constitution of India to formulate principles for determining this levy. Since levy has not been imposed on transaction of High Sea Sales in IGST Act, tax cannot be imposed on said transactions. GST Council clarification on the issue: GST council has deliberated the levy of Integrated Goods and Services Tax on high sea sales in the case of imported goods. The council has decided that IGST on high sea sale(s) transactions of imported goods, whether one or multiple, shall be levied and collected only at the time of importation i.e. when the import declarations are filed before the Customs authorities for the customs clearance purposes for the first time. Further, value addition accruing in each such high sea sale shall form part of the value on which IGST is collected at the time of clearance. [Para 4 of circular number 33/2017-Cus dated 01st August, 2017] Valuation of imported goods which have been sold in the course of import into territory of India: Value addition accruing in each such high sea sale shall form part of the value on which IGST is collected at the time of clearance. The above decision of the GST council is already envisioned in the provisions of sub-Section (12) of Section 3 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975 in as much as in respect of imported goods, all duties, taxes, cesses etc. shall be collected at the time of importation i.e. when the import declarations are filed before the customs authorities for the customs clearance purposes. The importer (last buyer in the chain) would be required to furnish the entire chain of documents, such as original Invoice, highseas-sales-contract, details of service charges/ commission paid etc., to establish a link between the first contracted price of the goods and the last transaction. In case of a doubt regarding the truth or accuracy of the declared value, the department may reject the declared transaction value and determine the price of the imported goods as provided in the Customs Valuation rules. [Para 5 of circular number 33/2017-Cus dated 01st August, 2017]
Conclusion
From the above discussion, it can be concluded that GST is not applicable on high sea sale transactions. Case when person files ‘Bill of Entry for Warehousing’ and goods are sold from custom warehouse It is a supply and taxable under GST Law. The transaction of sale/transfer etc. of the warehoused goods between the importer and any other person may be at a price higher than the assessable value of such goods. Such a transaction squarely falls within the definition of “supply” as per section 7 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and shall be taxable in terms of Section 9 of the CGST Act read with Section 20 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. It may be noted that as per sub-Section (2) of Section 7 of the IGST Act, any supply of imported goods which takes place before they cross the customs frontiers of India, shall be treated as an inter-State supply. Thus, such a transaction of sale/transfer will be subject to IGST under the IGST Act. The value of such supply shall be determined in terms of Section 15 of the CGST Act read with Section 20 of the IGST Act and the rules made thereunder, without prejudice to the fact that customs duty (which includes BCD and applicable IGST payable under the Customs Tariff Act) will be levied and collected at the ex-bond stage. [Circular Number 46/2017-Customs dated November 24, 2017] According to the author, it is undisputed that bond-to-bond transfer of goods is exigible under GST law but it should be considered as inter-state supply by virtue of Section 7(5) of IGST Act and not by Section 7(2) ibid. As discussed earlier, GST law does not define the expression ‘sale in course of import into territory of India’. However, reading the definition of ‘customs frontier of India’ gives an impression that it intends to cover with the net of said phrase:
a) High Sea Sales andb) Bond-to-bond transfer of goods
Further, considering the distinction between the terms ‘goods imported into India’ and ‘supply of goods in the course of import into India’ & on reading the term ‘goods imported into India’ under proviso to sub-Section (1) of Section 5 and in sub-Section (2) to Section 7 of IGST Act gives us an impression that bond-to-bond transfer of goods cannot be covered under sub-Section (2) of Section 7 of IGST Act. This is because the term ‘goods imported into India’ has been interpreted to mean ‘imports’ under proviso to sub-Section (1) of Section 5 of IGST Act, therefore, it cannot be interpreted to mean ‘bond-to-bond transfer’ under sub-Section (2) of Section 7 ibid. In case such an interpretation is to be adopted, then the term ‘goods imported into India’ shall mean ‘goods being imported into India’ for purposes of Section 7(2) and ‘import’ for the purposes of proviso to Section 5(1). Concluding remarks
- In case of bond-to-bond transfer of goods, last buyer in the chain should either be allowed refund of unutilised input tax credit to the extent as reflected in bill of entry for home consumption or be exempted from payment of customs duty i.e. IGST Hon’ble High Court, New Delhi in case of Devashish Polymers Private Limited vs. Union of India & Ors reported as 2018 (1) TMI 276 have entertained the writ petition filed on this point. Said petition have been listed for hearing on March 08, 2018 with a direction that in case the petitioner succeeds, the appropriate order shall be passed.
- The expression ‘supply in the course of import’ shall be defined under IGST Act to mean
a) High sea salesb) Bond-to-bond transfer
Wherein, high sea sales should be exempted or could be clarified in the manner that GST law does not apply on these transactions and bond-to-bond transfer should be exigible to GST OR The expression ‘supply of goods imported into the territory of India’ appearing in sub-Section (2) of Section 7 of IGST Act, 2017 shall be substituted with ‘supply of imported goods’ where ‘imported goods’ shall have the same meaning as defined under clause (25) of Section 2 of the Customs Act, 1962 Recommended Articles
GST RefundGST ReturnGST FormsGST RateGST RegistrationGST Invoice FormatHSN CodeGST LoginGST RulesGST Registration Status
